MG Software.
HomeAboutServicesPortfolioBlogCalculator
Contact Us
  1. Home
  2. /Alternatives
  3. /Best Firebase Firestore Alternatives 2026

Best Firebase Firestore Alternatives 2026

Discover the best Firestore alternatives for 2026. Compare Supabase, Appwrite, MongoDB Atlas, PocketBase and Convex on realtime, flexibility and vendor lock-in.

At MG Software, we recommend Supabase as the primary Firestore alternative for web applications due to its SQL power and open-source nature. For mobile apps with offline sync, MongoDB Atlas with Device Sync is the strongest alternative.

Why do people look for alternatives to Firebase Firestore is a serverless NoSQL document database from Google with realtime synchronization, offline support, automatic scaling and integration with the Firebase suite (Auth, Functions, Hosting, Cloud Messaging).?

Developers seek Firestore alternatives due to strong Google vendor lock-in, limited querying (no joins, limited aggregations), unpredictable costs at scale, and the desire to use SQL or open-source databases.

Best alternatives

Supabase

Open-source Firebase alternative built on PostgreSQL with realtime subscriptions via Postgres changes, Row Level Security, auth, storage and auto-generated REST API.

Pros

  • +Full SQL power with joins, aggregations and complex queries
  • +Open-source — no vendor lock-in, self-hosting possible
  • +Built-in auth, storage and edge functions comparable to Firebase

Cons

  • -No native offline sync like Firestore — requires extra implementation
  • -Realtime is based on Postgres changes, less granular control than Firestore listeners
Best for: Web applications wanting SQL power with a Firebase-like developer experience.

Appwrite

Open-source Backend-as-a-Service with document database, realtime events, authentication, storage and serverless functions — self-hostable or via Appwrite Cloud.

Pros

  • +Document model similar to Firestore for easier migration
  • +Fully open-source with Docker-based self-hosting option
  • +Extensive SDK support for web, mobile and server languages

Cons

  • -No offline sync — realtime events require an active connection
  • -Less mature ecosystem than Firebase with fewer community extensions
Best for: Teams wanting an open-source Firestore-like experience with self-hosting option.

MongoDB Atlas

Fully managed cloud MongoDB with Device Sync for offline-first mobile apps, Atlas App Services for serverless functions and a richer query model than Firestore.

Pros

  • +Device Sync for native offline-first mobile applications (via Realm)
  • +Richer document model with flexible aggregations and $lookup joins
  • +Multi-cloud deployment on AWS, GCP and Azure

Cons

  • -More complex pricing model than Firestore with multiple cost variables
  • -Device Sync (Realm) has a steeper learning curve than Firestore offline sync
Best for: Mobile apps needing offline sync with a richer query model than Firestore.

PocketBase

Open-source backend in a single Go binary with SQLite database, realtime subscriptions, auth and file storage — deploys in seconds on any server.

Pros

  • +Ultra-simple deployment — single binary, no Docker or dependencies needed
  • +Realtime subscriptions and auth out of the box
  • +Extremely low cost — runs on the smallest VPS

Cons

  • -No offline sync or mobile SDKs like Firestore
  • -SQLite base limits scalability for high-traffic applications
Best for: Indie developers and small teams looking for a simple Firestore-like backend.

Convex

Reactive serverless backend platform with TypeScript-first queries that automatically update in the UI, built-in caching and serverless functions.

Pros

  • +Reactive queries — UI updates automatically without manual listeners
  • +End-to-end TypeScript type safety from database to frontend
  • +No manual cache invalidation needed unlike Firestore + state management

Cons

  • -No offline sync — requires an active internet connection
  • -Proprietary data model and query language — no SQL or standard NoSQL
Best for: React/Next.js teams wanting a reactive data model with automatic UI updates.

What to consider when switching?

  • Determine whether you need offline sync for mobile applications
  • Compare query flexibility: SQL (Supabase) vs document (Appwrite) vs reactive (Convex)
  • Evaluate total costs at your expected reads, writes and data storage
  • Assess available SDKs for your platform (web, iOS, Android, Flutter)

Which alternative does MG Software recommend?

At MG Software, we recommend Supabase as the primary Firestore alternative for web applications due to its SQL power and open-source nature. For mobile apps with offline sync, MongoDB Atlas with Device Sync is the strongest alternative.

Further reading

AlternativesBest MongoDB Alternatives 2026Best DynamoDB Alternatives 2026Supabase vs Firebase: Complete Comparison GuideMongoDB vs PostgreSQL: Complete Comparison Guide

Related articles

Best Firebase Alternatives 2026

Discover the best Firebase alternatives for 2026. Compare Supabase, Appwrite, Neon + Auth.js, PocketBase and Convex on features, open-source and pricing.

Best MongoDB Alternatives 2026

Discover the best MongoDB alternatives for 2026. Compare PostgreSQL, Supabase, DynamoDB, CouchDB and Fauna on scalability, querying and cost.

Best DynamoDB Alternatives 2026

Discover the best DynamoDB alternatives for 2026. Compare MongoDB Atlas, ScyllaDB, CockroachDB, PlanetScale and Fauna on scalability, flexibility and cost.

Supabase vs Firebase: Complete Comparison Guide

Compare Supabase and Firebase on database type, real-time capabilities, scalability, and cost. Discover which Backend-as-a-Service platform is the best fit for your project.

Frequently asked questions

Yes, Supabase offers realtime, auth and storage comparable to Firebase, but with PostgreSQL SQL power. It does lack native offline sync, which is a requirement for some mobile apps.
MongoDB Atlas with Device Sync (Realm) offers the most mature offline sync functionality. PocketBase and Convex do not have native offline support.
Yes, you can export Firestore documents as JSON and convert them to PostgreSQL tables. Complexity depends on your nested documents and subcollections.

Is Supabase a good alternative to Firestore?

Yes, Supabase offers realtime, auth and storage comparable to Firebase, but with PostgreSQL SQL power. It does lack native offline sync, which is a requirement for some mobile apps.

Which Firestore alternative has offline sync?

MongoDB Atlas with Device Sync (Realm) offers the most mature offline sync functionality. PocketBase and Convex do not have native offline support.

Can I migrate Firestore data to Supabase?

Yes, you can export Firestore documents as JSON and convert them to PostgreSQL tables. Complexity depends on your nested documents and subcollections.

Ready to switch?

We help you migrate to the right platform.

Discuss your options

Related articles

Best Firebase Alternatives 2026

Discover the best Firebase alternatives for 2026. Compare Supabase, Appwrite, Neon + Auth.js, PocketBase and Convex on features, open-source and pricing.

Best MongoDB Alternatives 2026

Discover the best MongoDB alternatives for 2026. Compare PostgreSQL, Supabase, DynamoDB, CouchDB and Fauna on scalability, querying and cost.

Best DynamoDB Alternatives 2026

Discover the best DynamoDB alternatives for 2026. Compare MongoDB Atlas, ScyllaDB, CockroachDB, PlanetScale and Fauna on scalability, flexibility and cost.

Supabase vs Firebase: Complete Comparison Guide

Compare Supabase and Firebase on database type, real-time capabilities, scalability, and cost. Discover which Backend-as-a-Service platform is the best fit for your project.

MG Software
MG Software
MG Software.

MG Software builds custom software, websites and AI solutions that help businesses grow.

© 2026 MG Software B.V. All rights reserved.

NavigationServicesPortfolioAbout UsContactBlogCalculator
ResourcesKnowledge BaseComparisonsAlternativesExamplesToolsRefront
LocationsHaarlemAmsterdamThe HagueEindhovenBredaAmersfoortAll locations
IndustriesLegalEnergyHealthcareE-commerceLogisticsAll industries