DynamoDB vs MongoDB: Complete Comparison Guide
Compare DynamoDB and MongoDB on scalability, flexibility, cost, and querying. Discover which NoSQL database is the best fit for your application.
DynamoDB
AWS's fully managed NoSQL database delivering guaranteed single-digit millisecond latency at any scale. DynamoDB automatically scales from zero to millions of requests per second and offers a serverless model via on-demand capacity. It is deeply integrated into the AWS ecosystem with IAM, Lambda, and CloudWatch.
MongoDB
The world's most popular document database with a flexible schema and a powerful aggregation pipeline. MongoDB Atlas provides a fully managed cloud service on AWS, Azure, and GCP. With support for ad-hoc queries, secondary indexes, and ACID transactions, MongoDB offers maximum query flexibility.
Comparison table
| Feature | DynamoDB | MongoDB |
|---|---|---|
| Data model | Key-value and document model with strict partition and sort keys | Flexible document model (BSON) with dynamic schemas |
| Querying | Limited to primary key, sort key, and secondary indexes | Rich ad-hoc queries, aggregation pipeline, and full-text search |
| Scalability | Automatic horizontal scaling with guaranteed latency | Horizontally scalable via sharding in Atlas, manual configuration |
| Management | Fully serverless — no capacity planning needed with on-demand | Atlas Serverless available, but dedicated clusters recommended for production |
| Cost | Pay-per-request or provisioned capacity — predictable costs | Cluster-based pricing — costs depend on cluster configuration |
| Vendor lock-in | Tightly coupled to AWS ecosystem | Multi-cloud via Atlas, or self-hosted for full independence |
Verdict
DynamoDB and MongoDB are both powerful NoSQL databases but with fundamentally different approaches. DynamoDB excels at guaranteed latency and automatic scaling, but requires careful modeling of access patterns and offers limited query capabilities. MongoDB, on the other hand, provides maximum query flexibility with a rich aggregation pipeline and ad-hoc queries. The choice depends on your priorities: guaranteed performance at scale with DynamoDB, or maximum query flexibility and multi-cloud support with MongoDB.
Our recommendation
At MG Software, we recommend MongoDB Atlas when clients need a NoSQL solution with flexible queries and multi-cloud support. The aggregation pipeline and flexible document model fit well with projects that have varying data structures. For AWS-native architectures with predictable access patterns, DynamoDB can be a good choice. In most cases, however, we recommend PostgreSQL via Supabase as the primary database, supplemented with a NoSQL solution where it adds value.
Frequently asked questions
Related articles
MongoDB vs PostgreSQL: Complete Comparison Guide
Compare MongoDB and PostgreSQL on data models, querying, scalability, and ACID compliance. Discover which database is the best fit for your project.
SQL vs NoSQL: Complete Comparison Guide
Compare SQL and NoSQL databases on data structure, scalability, consistency, and use cases. Discover which database paradigm best fits your application.
Supabase vs Firebase: Complete Comparison Guide
Compare Supabase and Firebase on database type, real-time capabilities, scalability, and cost. Discover which Backend-as-a-Service platform is the best fit for your project.
Best Database Solutions 2026
Compare the best database solutions of 2026. From PostgreSQL to MongoDB — discover which database best fits your application needs.