n8n vs Make: Visual Automation Platform Comparison
Compare n8n and Make (formerly Integromat) on self-hosting, visual workflows, pricing, and complex scenarios. Discover which platform fits best.
n8n and Make are both powerful visual automation tools with different philosophies. n8n excels in self-hosting, open-source transparency, and code extensibility. Make offers superior visual scenario building with advanced routers and data transformations without code. For purely visual work, Make is more powerful; for control and extensibility, n8n wins.
n8n
An open-source automation platform with a node-based visual editor. n8n can be self-hosted, supports custom code in every step, and offers full control over data processing.
Make
A cloud-based visual automation platform (formerly Integromat) enabling complex scenarios with advanced data transformations, routers, and iterators in a drag-and-drop interface.
What are the key differences between n8n and Make?
| Feature | n8n | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free self-hosted; cloud from €20/month | Free tier (1,000 operations/month); paid from $9/month |
| Visual complexity | Linear node chains with branches and merge nodes | Advanced scenarios with routers, iterators, and aggregators |
| Self-hosting | Fully self-hostable with community edition | Cloud only; no self-hosting available |
| Data transformation | Via JavaScript/Python code or built-in functions | Extensive built-in functions, filters, and data mapping without code |
| Error handling | Custom error workflows and retry logic via code | Built-in error handlers, break/resume, and ignore routes per module |
What is the verdict on n8n vs Make?
n8n and Make are both powerful visual automation tools with different philosophies. n8n excels in self-hosting, open-source transparency, and code extensibility. Make offers superior visual scenario building with advanced routers and data transformations without code. For purely visual work, Make is more powerful; for control and extensibility, n8n wins.
Which option does MG Software recommend?
At MG Software, we choose n8n when clients prioritize self-hosting, Git version control, and code integration. We recommend Make for teams wanting to build complex data transformations visually without developer involvement, especially for elaborate scenarios with parallel paths.
Frequently asked questions
Related articles
n8n vs Zapier: Complete Workflow Automation Comparison
Compare n8n and Zapier on pricing, integrations, self-hosting, and extensibility. Discover which automation platform best fits your needs.
Zapier vs Make: No-Code Automation Platform Comparison
Compare Zapier and Make on integrations, scenario complexity, pricing, and ease of use. Discover which no-code automation platform best fits your team.
Workflow Automation Examples - More Efficient Business Processes
Explore workflow automation examples for businesses. Discover how automated workflows eliminate manual work and accelerate business processes effectively.
Best No-Code & Automation Tools 2026
Compare the best no-code and automation tools of 2026. From Zapier to n8n — discover which platform best suits your workflow automation.