MG Software.
HomeAboutServicesPortfolioBlog
Contact Us
  1. Home
  2. /Comparisons
  3. /NestJS vs Express: Complete Comparison Guide

NestJS vs Express: Complete Comparison Guide

Compare NestJS and Express on architecture, TypeScript support, scalability, and testability. Discover which Node.js framework is the best fit for your project.

NestJS

A progressive Node.js framework inspired by Angular that provides a structured architecture with decorators, modules, and dependency injection. NestJS is TypeScript-native and supports both Express and Fastify as underlying HTTP servers. It is designed for building scalable, enterprise-grade applications.

Express

The most widely used Node.js web framework offering maximum flexibility with a minimal API. Express imposes no architectural patterns and lets developers freely choose their own structure. It has the largest middleware ecosystem of any Node.js framework.

Comparison table

FeatureNestJSExpress
ArchitectureOpinionated — modules, controllers, and servicesMinimal — no imposed structure
TypeScript supportTypeScript-native — decorators and type-safe DIOptional via @types/express — no native integration
Dependency injectionBuilt-in DI system similar to AngularNot available — manual instantiation or external library
TestabilityExcellent — DI makes unit testing easy with mocksManual — test setup requires more configuration
MicroservicesBuilt-in support for gRPC, MQTT, Redis, and moreManual implementation — no built-in microservice tools
Learning curveMedium to high — DI, modules, and decorators take timeVery low — minimal concepts, quick to learn

Verdict

NestJS and Express serve fundamentally different needs. NestJS provides a complete, structured architecture ideal for large teams and complex applications — dependency injection, modules, and built-in microservice support make it an enterprise-worthy framework. Express offers maximum freedom and a minimal learning curve, perfect for small projects and rapid prototypes. For projects that will be developed beyond six months, NestJS's structure saves time long-term. For short projects, Express is more efficient.

Our recommendation

At MG Software, we use NestJS for complex backend projects where scalability and maintainability are crucial. The combination of TypeScript-native development, dependency injection, and structured modules aligns seamlessly with our quality standards. For our Next.js projects with simple API routes, we choose Express or Fastify. We recommend NestJS when your project has multiple services, complex business logic, or a team of more than three developers. For everything in between, Express with a self-chosen structure suffices.

Further reading

Express vs Fastify comparisonWhat is TypeScript?What is Node.js?

Related articles

Express vs Fastify: Complete Comparison Guide

Compare Express and Fastify on speed, TypeScript support, plugin ecosystem, and scalability. Discover which Node.js framework is the best fit for your project.

Best Backend Frameworks 2026

Compare the best backend frameworks of 2026. From NestJS to FastAPI — discover which framework best suits your server-side project.

Angular vs Vue: Complete Comparison Guide

Compare Angular and Vue on architecture, learning curve, TypeScript support, and ecosystem. Discover which framework best fits your team and project.

Django vs FastAPI: Complete Comparison Guide

Compare Django and FastAPI on speed, scalability, ORM support, and development velocity. Discover which Python framework is the best fit for your backend.

Frequently asked questions

NestJS is better for large, complex projects where structure and testability matter. Express is better for small projects where speed and flexibility are the priority. NestJS uses Express (or Fastify) internally, so it is not a replacement but a layer on top that adds structure.
By default, yes — NestJS uses Express as its HTTP adapter. However, you can switch to Fastify for better performance. The NestJS abstraction layer ensures your application code remains largely the same regardless of the underlying HTTP server.
For small APIs with fewer than ten endpoints, NestJS's structure can feel like overhead. The boilerplate for modules, controllers, and services adds complexity that is not necessary for small projects. However, for projects that grow, this investment pays off quickly in maintainability.

Ready to get started?

Get in touch for a no-obligation conversation about your project.

Get in touch

Related articles

Express vs Fastify: Complete Comparison Guide

Compare Express and Fastify on speed, TypeScript support, plugin ecosystem, and scalability. Discover which Node.js framework is the best fit for your project.

Best Backend Frameworks 2026

Compare the best backend frameworks of 2026. From NestJS to FastAPI — discover which framework best suits your server-side project.

Angular vs Vue: Complete Comparison Guide

Compare Angular and Vue on architecture, learning curve, TypeScript support, and ecosystem. Discover which framework best fits your team and project.

Django vs FastAPI: Complete Comparison Guide

Compare Django and FastAPI on speed, scalability, ORM support, and development velocity. Discover which Python framework is the best fit for your backend.

MG Software
MG Software
MG Software.

MG Software builds custom software, websites and AI solutions that help businesses grow.

© 2026 MG Software B.V. All rights reserved.

NavigationServicesPortfolioAbout UsContactBlog
ResourcesKnowledge BaseComparisonsExamplesToolsRefront
LocationsHaarlemAmsterdamThe HagueEindhovenBredaAmersfoortAll locations
IndustriesLegalEnergyHealthcareE-commerceLogisticsAll industries