Does Nginx support .htaccess?

No, Nginx does not support .htaccess files. All configuration must be centrally defined in Nginx configuration files. This is a deliberate design choice: eliminating per-request filesystem lookups for .htaccess files makes Nginx faster. For teams accustomed to .htaccess, this is a drawback that can make migration complex, but it results in better performance and more predictable behavior.

Which web server is better for containers?

Nginx is clearly the better choice for container environments. The official Nginx Alpine Docker image is under 10 MB, while Apache images are significantly larger. Nginx's low memory footprint and efficient connection handling make it ideal for container-based architectures where resources are shared. Nginx is also the standard ingress controller for Kubernetes via the nginx-ingress project.

Nginx vs Apache: Event-Driven or Process-Based Architecture?

Event-driven concurrency or flexible .htaccess configuration? Nginx and Apache are both proven, but serve fundamentally different architecture needs.

Nginx and Apache are both proven web servers with decades of production experience, but they excel in fundamentally different scenarios. Nginx wins convincingly in concurrency, resource efficiency and performance under heavy load, making it the preferred choice for modern high-traffic applications, reverse proxy setups and container-based architectures. Apache excels in flexibility through extensive .htaccess support and its rich module ecosystem, making it ideal for shared hosting environments, legacy applications and scenarios where per-directory configuration is essential. In practice, they are often combined: Nginx as a reverse proxy and SSL terminator in front of Apache that processes dynamic content.

Background

The choice of web server is one of the most fundamental infrastructure decisions for any web project and directly impacts performance, scalability and operational maintenance. Nginx and Apache together dominate over 60% of the web server market in 2026, with Nginx being the fastest growing for years. The difference in architecture (event-driven versus process-driven) determines how efficiently the server handles concurrent connections, memory usage and CPU load. For modern cloud-native and container-based architectures, this choice is particularly relevant.

Nginx

An event-driven web server and reverse proxy known worldwide for its exceptional concurrency capabilities and minimal resource footprint. Nginx handles tens of thousands of simultaneous connections effortlessly through an asynchronous, non-blocking I/O architecture that fundamentally differs from traditional process-based web servers. It is deployed globally as a reverse proxy, load balancer, HTTP cache and SSL/TLS terminator handling billions of requests per day. With Nginx Plus, the commercial version offers additional features such as active health checks, session persistence and a real-time monitoring dashboard.

Apache

The Apache HTTP Server is the longest-running open-source web server in the world, continuously developed since 1995 under the Apache Software Foundation. With a process-driven architecture via configurable MPM modules (prefork, worker and event), extensive per-directory .htaccess support, and an ecosystem of over 500 modules including mod_rewrite, mod_security and mod_php, Apache offers maximum flexibility and compatibility. It is the default web server on most Linux distributions, the foundation of countless shared hosting environments and still responsible for a significant portion of the internet.

What are the key differences between Nginx and Apache?

Feature	Nginx	Apache
Architecture	Event-driven, asynchronous non-blocking I/O with a single master and multiple worker processes	Process/thread-driven with configurable MPM modules (prefork, worker, event) for different workloads
Concurrency	Excellent: handles 10,000+ simultaneous connections with minimal memory usage per connection	Good with event MPM, but higher memory footprint and CPU usage under very high concurrent connections
Configuration	Centralized configuration files in /etc/nginx/ without per-directory overrides, faster per request	.htaccess for per-directory configuration without server restart, flexible but filesystem lookup per request
Reverse proxy	Native high-performance reverse proxy and load balancer with upstream health checks and caching	mod_proxy module with basic reverse proxy functionality, less optimized for high throughput
Dynamic content	Proxies to external processes like PHP-FPM, uWSGI, Gunicorn and Node.js via FastCGI or HTTP	Built-in module support with mod_php for direct PHP execution within the Apache process
Community	Fast-growing and dominant in modern cloud-native infrastructure, containers and Kubernetes ingress	Longest history with extensive documentation, widely installed and deeply rooted in the hosting ecosystem
SSL/TLS	Efficient SSL/TLS termination with support for HTTP/2, HTTP/3 (QUIC) and OCSP stapling	SSL/TLS via mod_ssl with HTTP/2 support, HTTP/3 experimentally available via mod_http3
Container support	Official minimal Docker images (Alpine-based, under 10 MB) ideal for container environments	Docker images available but larger, less common in container-native architectures

When to choose which?

Choose Nginx when...

Choose Nginx when you need high concurrency with minimal memory usage per connection, when you need an efficient reverse proxy and load balancer for microservices or container architectures, or when you want a lightweight web server for Docker-based deployments. Nginx is also the better choice for SSL/TLS termination, HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 (QUIC) support and as ingress controller in Kubernetes clusters.

Choose Apache when...

Choose Apache when you need .htaccess per-directory configuration without server restart, when you work in a shared hosting environment where users need to independently adjust configuration, or when you have legacy PHP applications dependent on mod_php for direct module integration. Apache is also the better choice when you have extensive mod_rewrite rules and mod_security configuration that are not easily translated to Nginx.

What is the verdict on Nginx vs Apache?

Which option does MG Software recommend?

At MG Software, we use Nginx as our default web server and reverse proxy for all projects and containerized deployments. The event-driven architecture fits perfectly with our cloud-native stack on Vercel and delivers excellent performance under high concurrency with minimal resource usage. We configure Nginx as a reverse proxy for Next.js, Node.js and other application servers, with optimized caching strategies and SSL/TLS configuration. For clients with existing Apache configurations, we offer migration guidance, systematically converting .htaccess rules to Nginx configuration blocks, translating mod_rewrite rules and measuring performance before and after migration.

Migrating: what to consider?

When migrating from Apache to Nginx, .htaccess rules must be systematically converted to Nginx configuration blocks. The mod_rewrite syntax differs significantly from Nginx rewrite directives: Apache uses regex-based RewriteRule with flags while Nginx has its own rewrite syntax. Thoroughly test all URL redirects and rewrites in a staging environment, as subtle behavioral differences can lead to unexpected 404 errors or redirect loops. Document all existing .htaccess rules before starting the conversion.

Frequently asked questions

For serving static content and handling many simultaneous connections, Nginx is generally significantly faster thanks to its event-driven architecture that uses minimal memory per connection. For dynamic content (via PHP-FPM or similar), the difference is smaller since the bottleneck lies with the application server, not the web server. Apache with event MPM approaches Nginx performance for many use cases, but under very high concurrency (10,000+ connections), Nginx maintains a clear advantage.

Yes, this is a common and proven setup used by many major hosting providers. Nginx serves as a reverse proxy, SSL terminator and load balancer on the front end, while Apache handles dynamic content on the back end. This combines Nginx's efficient connection handling with Apache's rich module ecosystem. The setup is straightforward to configure via Nginx upstream blocks that forward traffic to Apache on an internal port.

Both work excellently with WordPress, but with different trade-offs. Apache is traditionally more popular thanks to .htaccess support that WordPress uses by default for permalink configuration. Nginx requires manual configuration for URL rewrites but delivers better performance under high traffic due to lower per-request overhead. Many large WordPress sites (including WordPress.com itself) use Nginx with PHP-FPM for optimal speed and scalability.

Yes, Apache remains relevant despite the growth of Nginx. It is still responsible for a significant portion of the internet, particularly in shared hosting environments, enterprise settings and with legacy applications. The .htaccess functionality and extensive module ecosystem offer unique advantages that Nginx does not replicate. Apache's event MPM has significantly improved performance, keeping it competitive for many workloads.

For all new projects, we recommend Nginx as web server and reverse proxy. The event-driven architecture, minimal resource footprint and seamless integration with container environments make it the ideal choice for our modern stack. For clients with existing Apache configurations, we offer migration guidance. In specific cases, such as shared hosting with .htaccess requirements, we acknowledge that Apache can be the pragmatic choice.

Need help choosing?

We help you make the right choice for your project.

Schedule a free call

Caddy vs Nginx: Web Server Comparison

Caddy auto-configures HTTPS with just a few lines of config, Nginx delivers unmatched performance for complex setups. Simplicity versus raw power.

8 Deployment Platforms Compared: Which Ships Fastest in 2026?

Vercel leads on edge speed, Railway wins on pricing. Eight platforms tested on build time, DX and cost at scale.

Vercel vs Netlify: Which Deployment Platform Should You Choose?

Using Next.js? Vercel seems obvious - but Netlify offers more built-in services. A practical comparison of both deployment platforms.

AWS vs Azure: Which Cloud Platform Should You Choose?

Already on Microsoft licenses? Azure pulls ahead. Purely technical? AWS offers the most. A comparison on services, pricing, and scalability.