Bun vs Node.js: Complete Comparison Guide
Compare Bun and Node.js on speed, built-in tools, compatibility, and stability. Discover which JavaScript runtime is the best fit for your project.
Bun
A blazing-fast JavaScript/TypeScript runtime written in Zig designed as a drop-in replacement for Node.js. Bun offers three times faster startup, a built-in bundler, test runner, and package manager. It uses JavaScriptCore (Safari's engine) instead of V8 and aims for full Node.js compatibility.
Node.js
The standard JavaScript runtime that has been the foundation of server-side JavaScript for over fifteen years. Node.js runs on Google's V8 engine, provides a stable, well-documented platform, and has the largest package ecosystem via NPM. It is supported by virtually every hosting platform.
Comparison table
| Feature | Bun | Node.js |
|---|---|---|
| Startup time | Up to 3x faster than Node.js — ideal for serverless | Standard startup time — sufficient for long-running processes |
| Runtime performance | Faster for many operations thanks to Zig and JavaScriptCore | Stable performance via V8 with years of optimizations |
| Built-in tools | Bundler, test runner, package manager all-in-one | External tools required — webpack, Jest, NPM/Yarn/pnpm |
| TypeScript support | Native — TypeScript and JSX work without configuration | Via transpilation — build step or ts-node required |
| NPM compatibility | High — most NPM packages work, some edge cases | Complete — all NPM packages work guaranteed |
| Stability | Rapidly improving — some edge cases in production | Extremely stable — proven in millions of production environments |
Verdict
Bun is the fastest JavaScript runtime available, offering a compelling all-in-one package with built-in bundler, test runner, and package manager. The three times faster startup makes it particularly suited for serverless environments. However, Node.js remains the standard for production thanks to unmatched stability and full ecosystem compatibility. Bun is ideal for development environments and new projects. For business-critical production systems, we still recommend Node.js until Bun reaches the same maturity level.
Our recommendation
At MG Software, we increasingly use Bun as a package manager and for running tests thanks to the significant speed gains in our development workflow. For production deployments, we stick with Node.js for stability and broad platform support. We expect Bun to become a fully viable production alternative in the near future. For new projects, we advise evaluating Bun as the development runtime and Node.js as the production runtime — the best of both worlds.
Frequently asked questions
Related articles
Deno vs Node.js: Complete Comparison Guide
Compare Deno and Node.js on TypeScript support, security, package management, and compatibility. Discover which JavaScript runtime is the best fit for your project.
Rust vs Node.js: Complete Comparison Guide
Compare Rust and Node.js on performance, memory safety, development speed, and ecosystem. Discover when to choose Rust over Node.js for your backend.
TypeScript vs JavaScript: When Should You Choose Type Safety?
Compare TypeScript and JavaScript on type safety, productivity, and scalability. Discover when TypeScript is the better choice for your project.
Best Frontend Frameworks 2026
Compare the best frontend frameworks of 2026. From React to Svelte — discover which framework best suits your project and team.