Jira vs Linear: Complete Comparison Guide
Compare Jira and Linear on speed, customization, workflow, and user experience. Discover which project management tool is the best fit for your team.
Jira
Atlassian's enterprise project management platform used by over 10 million teams worldwide. Jira offers extensive customization with custom fields, workflows, automations, and dashboards. As part of the Atlassian ecosystem, Jira integrates seamlessly with Confluence, Bitbucket, and other Atlassian products.
Linear
A modern, keyboard-first issue tracker designed for speed and simplicity. Linear offers an opinionated workflow with cycles, projects, and triage — built by a team frustrated with the complexity of existing tools. With a clean UI and blazing-fast interface, Linear is the tool of choice for fast-growing tech teams.
Comparison table
| Feature | Jira | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Can feel sluggish due to feature-rich interface and complex configuration | Blazing fast — local cache, keyboard shortcuts, instant search |
| Customization | Extremely customizable — custom fields, workflows, screens, dashboards | Opinionated — deliberately limited customization for consistent workflow |
| Workflow | Fully configurable statuses, transitions, and automations | Fixed but thoughtful workflow with cycles, triage, and roadmaps |
| Integrations | Thousands of integrations via Atlassian Marketplace and REST API | GitHub, Slack, Figma, Sentry — focused integrations for developer teams |
| Scalability | Proven at enterprise scale with 10M+ teams and complex organizations | Optimal for teams of 5-500 people, growing enterprise offering |
| Pricing | Free up to 10 users, Standard $8.15/user/month | Free for small teams, Plus $8/user/month |
Verdict
Jira and Linear represent two philosophies in project management. Jira offers maximum flexibility and customization — you can model virtually any process, but that power comes with complexity. Linear deliberately chooses an opinionated approach: less configuration, more focus on speed and a consistent workflow. For enterprise organizations with complex processes, Jira remains the standard. For tech teams that prioritize speed and developer experience, Linear is a breath of fresh air. The industry trend points toward Linear's philosophy of simplicity over complexity.
Our recommendation
At MG Software, we follow a Linear-style workflow that prioritizes speed and simplicity over extensive configuration. We use cycles for sprint planning and triage for prioritizing incoming work. For clients, we recommend Linear for tech teams up to about 200 people — the speed and developer experience are unmatched. For enterprise clients with existing Atlassian investments or complex cross-departmental workflows, Jira remains a solid choice when properly configured and maintained.
Frequently asked questions
Related articles
Trello vs Asana: Complete Comparison Guide
Compare Trello and Asana on kanban, timelines, project management, and scalability. Discover which tool is the best fit for your team.
Best Project Management Tools 2026
Discover the best project management tools of 2026. Compare features, pricing, and integrations to choose the ideal tool for your team.
ClickUp vs Monday.com: Complete Comparison Guide
Compare ClickUp and Monday.com on features, views, automations, and pricing. Discover which all-in-one platform is the best fit for your team.
What is Scrum? - Definition & Meaning
Learn what Scrum is, how this agile methodology works, and why Scrum is the most popular framework for iterative software development in teams.